LargitData — Enterprise Intelligence & Risk AI Platform

Last updated:

Knowledge Graphs and Semantic Search: Enabling AI to Truly Understand Your Data

A Knowledge Graph is a technology that organizes and represents knowledge using a graph structure, connecting information from disparate sources into a structured knowledge network through a web of entities and relations. When knowledge graphs are combined with semantic search technology, enterprises can build intelligent search systems that truly "understand" the meaning of data, transcending the limitations of traditional keyword matching. This article provides a deep analysis of the technical principles behind knowledge graphs, how semantic search is implemented, and the key role knowledge graphs play in enterprise AI applications.

Basic Concepts and Structure of Knowledge Graphs

The core idea of a knowledge graph is to represent real-world knowledge using a graph structure. In a knowledge graph, information is stored in the form of "triples": Subject — Predicate — Object. For example: "LargitData — developed — InfoMiner", "InfoMiner — is a — sentiment analysis platform", "sentiment analysis — uses — natural language processing technology". Through a large number of such triples, a vast knowledge network is constructed in which each node represents an entity and each edge represents a relationship between entities.

A knowledge graph's structure is composed of two main parts. The Schema Layer defines what categories of entities (e.g., companies, products, technologies) and what types of relationships (e.g., developed, uses, belongs to) exist in the graph — it is the "skeleton" of the knowledge. The Data Layer is populated with specific entity and relationship instances based on the schema — it is the "flesh" of the knowledge.

Well-known knowledge graphs include Google's Knowledge Graph (which powers Google Search's knowledge panels), Wikipedia's Wikidata, and domain-specific knowledge graphs built by enterprises. When Google launched its Knowledge Graph in 2012, it introduced the famous tagline: "Things, not strings" — a phrase that precisely captures the core value of knowledge graphs: enabling search systems to understand the true meaning of a user's query rather than simply matching text.

Building a knowledge graph typically involves multiple technical steps: Named Entity Recognition (NER) extracts entities from text; Relation Extraction identifies relationships between entities; Entity Linking maps recognized entities to existing nodes in the knowledge graph; and Knowledge Fusion integrates knowledge from different sources.

Traditional keyword search returns results based solely on surface-level text matching — the keywords a user enters must exactly match the words in a document (or approximate them through synonym expansion). This approach cannot understand the semantic intent of a query, often leading to relevant results being missed or irrelevant results being returned. For example, searching for "how to prevent AI data leaks" might fail to surface an article titled "Enterprise AI Data Security Best Practices" using traditional search, because the keywords do not match.

Semantic Search returns results based on an understanding of query intent and document meaning. Its technical foundation rests on two pillars: vector embeddings and knowledge graphs. Vector embeddings use deep learning models to transform text into high-dimensional numerical vectors, so that text with similar meanings is located close together in the vector space. Knowledge graphs provide structured knowledge about entities and their relationships, helping the search system understand the concepts involved in a query and how they relate to one another.

In RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) systems, semantic search plays a critical role. When a user poses a question to an AI system, the semantic search engine retrieves the most relevant document passages from the enterprise knowledge base, which then serve as reference material for the large language model to generate its answer. The quality of semantic search directly determines the accuracy and completeness of a RAG system's responses.

Semantic search augmented with a knowledge graph enables much smarter query understanding. For example, when a user searches "What sentiment analysis tools are available in Taiwan?", the system can not only understand the meaning of "sentiment analysis tool" but also leverage relationship reasoning in the knowledge graph to know that "InfoMiner" is a "sentiment analysis platform" and that "LargitData" is a "Taiwan-based AI company" — thereby returning highly relevant results.

Applications of Knowledge Graphs in Enterprise AI

Enterprise knowledge management is one of the most valuable application domains for knowledge graphs. Knowledge in large enterprises is typically scattered across countless documents, systems, and people's minds, creating "knowledge silos". Through a knowledge graph, enterprises can organize this dispersed knowledge in a structured way, building a multi-dimensional corporate knowledge network that spans products, processes, customers, and technology. Employees can intuitively query and explore enterprise knowledge through a semantic search interface, rather than searching for a needle in a haystack of documents.

Intelligent customer service and Q&A systems are another important application of knowledge graphs. Traditional FAQ systems can only answer pre-configured questions, whereas knowledge-graph-based Q&A systems can understand users' natural language questions, perform reasoning and path traversal in the knowledge graph, and generate accurate, well-structured answers. For example, if a customer asks "Which social media platforms does InfoMiner support?", the system can retrieve the "supports" relationships between InfoMiner and each social platform from the knowledge graph and directly list the complete platform inventory.

In the financial sector, knowledge graphs are widely used for risk control and fraud prevention. By constructing relationship graphs among companies, individuals, accounts, and transactions, financial institutions can rapidly identify suspicious fund flows, related-party transactions, and complex webs of interest. This graph-structure-based analytical capability is difficult to achieve with traditional relational databases.

In the healthcare and life sciences sectors, knowledge graphs are used to organize complex relationships among diseases, symptoms, drugs, and genes, supporting clinical decision-making, drug interaction checking, and target discovery in drug development. In manufacturing, knowledge graphs record relationships among equipment, components, and failure modes, supporting predictive maintenance and fault diagnosis.

Combining Knowledge Graphs with RAG: Graph RAG

Traditional RAG systems rely primarily on vector-based semantic search to retrieve relevant documents, but this approach can underperform on complex questions that require multi-step reasoning or the integration of information from multiple sources. Graph RAG is an emerging technical architecture that combines knowledge graphs with RAG systems, enabling AI systems to simultaneously leverage the semantic understanding of vector search and the structured reasoning capability of knowledge graphs when generating answers.

In a Graph RAG architecture, enterprise knowledge is indexed not only as vector embeddings (for semantic search) but also organized as a knowledge graph (for structured querying and reasoning). When a user poses a question, the system can first use semantic search to locate relevant document passages, then use the knowledge graph for relationship reasoning to supplement information that semantic search may have missed. This hybrid retrieval strategy can significantly improve the answer quality of a RAG system on complex questions.

For example, consider the question "Which LargitData products can help financial institutions with compliance monitoring?" Pure vector search might only retrieve documents that directly mention "financial" and "compliance". Graph RAG, however, can reason through the knowledge graph as follows: InfoMiner (sentiment analysis) → can be used for "negative news monitoring" → falls within the scope of "compliance monitoring"; RAGi (knowledge management) → can be used for "regulatory document retrieval" → falls within the scope of "compliance monitoring" — thereby providing a far more comprehensive answer.

Methods and Best Practices for Building Enterprise Knowledge Graphs

The first step in building an enterprise knowledge graph is defining the ontology — determining which categories of entities and which types of relationships the graph needs to encompass. This process requires close collaboration between domain experts and knowledge engineers, balancing comprehensive coverage of business knowledge needs with a structure that is both logically sound and extensible.

Knowledge population can be accomplished through multiple approaches. Automated knowledge extraction uses NLP technology to automatically identify entities and relationships from unstructured text (such as documents, web pages, and reports). Structured data import maps data from databases, Excel spreadsheets, APIs, and other structured sources directly into the knowledge graph. Manual annotation handles complex knowledge that automated methods struggle with. In practice, these three approaches are typically combined — with automation as the primary method and manual annotation as a supplement.

Maintaining and updating a knowledge graph is equally important. Enterprise knowledge is dynamic — new product launches, organizational restructuring, and process updates all need to be reflected in the knowledge graph. Establishing automated knowledge update pipelines that keep the knowledge graph synchronized with the organization's various data sources is key to long-term success. Quality control mechanisms are also essential — including entity deduplication, relationship consistency checks, and knowledge freshness monitoring.

Choosing an appropriate graph database is the foundation of technical implementation. Leading graph databases include Neo4j, Amazon Neptune, and JanusGraph. Selection should take into account data scale, query performance, integration with existing systems, and the team's technical familiarity.

Further Reading

FAQ

Relational databases store data in tabular form and use SQL queries; they excel at handling structured data with a fixed schema. Knowledge graphs store data in a graph structure (nodes and edges) and excel at representing and querying complex relationships between entities. The advantages of knowledge graphs include: (1) Flexible schema — new entity types and relationship types can be added easily without modifying table structures; (2) Relationship query efficiency — multi-hop relationship queries (e.g., "find the competitors of the companies of the people A knows") are far more efficient in a graph database than in a relational database; (3) Semantic expressiveness — complex knowledge structures can be represented naturally.
The timeline depends on the scope and complexity of the knowledge. A focused domain-specific knowledge graph (such as a product knowledge base or customer relationship graph), from ontology design to initial data population, typically takes two to three months. A comprehensive enterprise-level knowledge graph may take six months to a year. Importantly, building a knowledge graph should not aim for perfection from the outset — an agile, iterative approach is recommended: build the core knowledge first, validate its value, then gradually expand the scope and depth.
Full-text search (such as Elasticsearch) matches documents based on keywords and term frequency statistics; results depend on whether the query terms appear in a document and how frequently and where they appear. Semantic search, by contrast, is based on understanding the meaning of text — through vector embedding technology, it can match documents even when the query and the document use entirely different words, as long as they are semantically similar. For example, searching for "social media buzz monitoring" can retrieve documents containing "sentiment analysis". In practice, the best results are typically achieved by combining both approaches — using full-text search to ensure high recall for exact matches and semantic search to expand coverage to semantically related results.
Yes, modern NLP technology can automatically extract entities and relationships from unstructured text to build a knowledge graph. Large language models perform particularly well in this regard — they can automatically identify entities (people, organizations, products, concepts, etc.) and the relationships between them from documents, web pages, reports, and other text sources. However, the quality of automatic extraction does not always reach 100% accuracy and typically requires human review and correction. A common practical approach is the "automatic extraction + human review" hybrid model, which balances efficiency with quality.
Knowledge graphs can be integrated with existing AI systems in multiple ways. In RAG systems, a knowledge graph can serve as a supplemental knowledge source, working in parallel with a vector database to provide structured knowledge retrieval. In conversational systems, a knowledge graph can supply chatbots with accurate factual information and relationship-querying capabilities. In search systems, a knowledge graph can enrich search results by providing entity cards and related recommendations. Most graph databases offer standard query languages (such as Cypher and SPARQL) and REST APIs, making integration with various application systems straightforward.
The ROI of a knowledge graph depends on the complexity of an enterprise's knowledge and its application requirements. If an organization's knowledge structure is relatively simple, a traditional document management system or a basic RAG system may be sufficient. However, if the enterprise needs to manage complex product relationships, supply chain networks, customer relationships, or regulatory compliance — all of which involve large numbers of inter-entity relationships — a knowledge graph can deliver significant value. Small and mid-sized enterprises can start with a small-scale domain-specific knowledge graph, such as a product knowledge graph or a customer relationship graph, and scale up gradually.

References

  1. Hogan, A., et al. (2021). "Knowledge Graphs." ACM Computing Surveys, 54(4). DOI: 10.1145/3447772
  2. Ji, S., et al. (2022). "A Survey on Knowledge Graphs: Representation, Acquisition, and Applications." IEEE TNNLS, 33(2). DOI: 10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3070843
  3. Edge, D., et al. (2024). "From Local to Global: A Graph RAG Approach to Query-Focused Summarization." arXiv:2404.16130

Want to learn how to build an enterprise intelligent search system?

Contact our team of experts to learn how RAGi combines semantic search with knowledge management to deliver an intelligent knowledge retrieval experience for your enterprise.

Contact Us